WILLFUL SUPRESSION OF EVIDENCE?

TURNING OVER EVIDENCE IS AN OBLIGATION, NOT AN OPTION. 

FOR THIRTEEN MONTHS, it appears that documents which were properly requested during discovery have not been turned over by Digital.  I recalled one specific item someone had mentioned to me years ago.  I requested a copy several times but was told it did not exist.  The may be a problem for the Defendant for a number of reasons. Denial  of the document was a risky move.


May 11, 2016 – Somers to Seyfarth: 

“Was there any kind of announcement done at Digital after I was terminated which might have been sent out to my team or colleagues to explain my departure in any way? If so please provide.”

May 13, 2013 – Seyfarth to Somers :  

“In terms of an email announcing your separation, we have not located any such communication that was issued. Rather, as reflected in DLR_0005501, your direct reports were notified on a phone call and others in the office were informed verbally as well.  You are mistaken.”


Screen Shot 2016-06-14 at 7.47.24 PM.png

 

 

Thanks to the anonymous person who sent this to the link I had up on the website.  It is unlikely that it was missed the Defendants, there are hundreds and hundreds of copies in Digital’s email system. It is an important document for a number reasons.

There is also proof that a second document is being withheld.  The Court has been notified of both items.

 

 

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s